For or against, choose your side.

against, lets wait for someone to say otherwise

I'm saying he was underrated.

okay so the starting argument, you go first state your case on why he's underrated

Edit: I start first right? sorry new to pc debating

So I'll start,

I think he was not because he was awarded two or three WWE Titles, WrestleMania Main Event, was chosen to defeat better wrestlers such as Kurt Angle, Undertaker,etc and was given the big dog situation.

If he was underrated they wouldn't have lethim accomplish a resume like that

This man is underrated because he was a JC National Champion in college, and was the runner up National Champ in his junior year, he then won the championship the next year as a senior. He then joined the WWE, was sent to OVW where he won tag championships with Shelton Benjamin. He was called up to the WWE roster in 2002, during that time he was a king of the ring, a royal rumble winner, and a 3 time WWE champion. He is underrated because he never won any other title besides the WWE championship, he was on a Smackdown roster that was lacking. For gods sakes he was pitted again Hardcore Holly in the main event at No Way Out. Other then that he had Eddie Guerrero, Undertaker, and Kurt Angle to contend with on Smackdown. Undertaker was injured half the time, Kurt Angle took the title from Lesnar 2 times, Eddie did it the third time. Who did Lesnar have to contend with? He never beat The Game, Batista, Cena, Edge, and Goldberg. How can he be overrated if he never had anyone worth a damn to beat?

losing titles does not make you underrated, actually I think Big Show took one of his titles from him at Survivor Series if I remember correctly, but back on topic, what else is he supposed to wear?

well that happens he should be glad he won Rumble, KOTR, WWE Title and held Smackdown on his back at all. Nobody worth a damn, you call Kurt Angle, The Undertaker, Big Show, Shelton Benjamin, Charlie Haas, and countless others not worth a damn.

The reason he didn't most of them is because he was on SD! his match with Goldberg at WM20 was so boring the fans chanted it, if Stone Cold wasn't ref nobody would of cared for that match at all

He could of won the US Title, a Tag Title, but never he lost to Angle over half the times he faced him. So how can he be overrated if he never got the competiton or the perfect time slot to showcase his talent, he was expected to be the face of the B team brand. How can he carry a show with nobody else to work with, that is like asking CM to carry ECW when he has nobody else really big to work with. Its a joke.

Alrighty this debate is done. Cast your votes now.

My vote goes to stl311. I felt he had more quality arguments and presented them in a better format. I also like how he included Brock's background before WWE into determining whether he was underrated when he was in the WWE.

I'm actually going to vote for myself for two reasons one I think I made the better argument honesty. And two this person is only 12, which means when Brock started wrestling they were only 6 or 7 clearly not old enough to understand what good wrestling is.

I'm going with stl311 too, he knew his stuff and argued it well.

Voting for stl more facts and stuff really convinced me. And I started off thinking he wasn't underrated lol.

stl my age doesn't matter, waht you going to talk about good wrestling, I'm not the one that takes Terry Funk over Ric Flair am I, since when did debates matter on age, this is why he's underrated in wwe has nothing to do with when he started wrestling. you just judge people on stereotypes oh he was 6 or 7 he doesn't know what good wrestling is. Your just using my age as an excuse for people to vote for you, you should really stick yo your argument and not how old other people are

For one, I'm old enough to have seen both Flair and Funk. For two the only reason I said something about it was because it is hard for someone who is 12 to debate with someone in college. Also, when I was 6 or 7 I was watching X-Men and Ninja Turtles not Brock Lesnar on tv. As a matter of fact I didn't even get into wrestling until I was 8 or 9, the point I was trying to make is you can watch old Lesnar DVDs but you don't have the experince I have with watching Lesnar week in and week out so it is not really easy for you to look at him on paper and write an argument on it. Don't get your panties in a wad junior and don't take it personal it was a point that was straight forward.

okay just wanted to get that clear

Have to vote stl....he had the best argument. Also, he presented plenty of facts to back it up.